Blast chilling methods could change meat tenderness

Tuesday, 06 November, 2012


A recent study looked at the tenderness and other meat quality traits of pork longissimus muscle, comparing different stunning methods and carcass chilling rates at slaughter facilities.

The pigs used in this study came from one barn on a commercial finishing operation. Pigs were taken to one of three slaughter facilities. Plant A used CO2 stunning and conventional spray chilling; Plant B used CO2 stunning and blast chilling; and Plant C used electrical stunning and blast chilling.

“Blast chilling is a rapid cooling of the muscles for at least 45 minutes at less than -23°C,” said Steven Shackelford of US Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC).

Blast-chilling systems are used to increase packing plant throughput, enhance food safety and improve meat quality, particularly water-holding capacity of muscles from stress-susceptible pigs.

After slaughter, carcasses were cooled by blast chilling or conventional spray chilling. The researchers used a loin from the left side of the carcass for evaluation. They sent the loins to the USMARC, where the loins were refrigerated and weighed for purge loss. Purge loss is the loss of fluid from meat.

At 15 days post mortem, the meat was cooked and the researchers measure the longissimus muscle slice shear force. Slice shear force is a measurement of meat tenderness. The higher the shear force, the tougher the meat. They also tested the meat samples for marbling, muscle fibre length, moisture content, colour, the breakdown of proteins and intramuscular fat content.

The researchers found no loin quality advantages from blast chilling. They did find a 13-fold increase in excessively tough samples from blast chilling. This research shows that differences in chilling systems among pork packing plants can have a strong influence on loin chop tenderness.

“This study showed that blast chilling can have a very substantial negative impact on tenderness. So there are trade-offs that must be considered,” said Shackelford.

The findings are surprising because past literature suggests that blast chilling had little importance. The researchers believe this is due to changes in genetics and production systems, which can affect chilling rate. The researchers also found that regardless of chilling method, CO2 stunning resulted in darker longissimus muscle lean colour and greater longissimus muscle water-holding capacity than electrical stunning.

For the future, the researchers would like to see studies that determine whether differences exist consistently across conventional and blast-chill plants over multiple seasons of the year and multiple production systems.

“Given the real and perceived advantages of blast chilling, we think that more research is needed to determine optimal blast-chilling conditions for a balance of all meat quality traits and other economical issues,” said Shackelford.

This research has been published in the Journal of Animal Science.

Related Articles

Norco Lismore ice-cream factory back in business after flood recovery process

After an 18-month flood recovery process that cost more than $100m, the Norco Lismore ice-cream...

Is the food industry ready for El Niño?

A pest behavioural expert explains some details about how El Niño could affect insect...

Otis oat milk manufacturing returns home to New Zealand

Ever since launching their company in 2018, Otis co-founders Tim Ryan and Chris Wilkie have been...


  • All content Copyright © 2024 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd