Reducing Salmonella contamination on chicken carcasses

By
Wednesday, 06 October, 2010


Poultry processors who constantly engage in the battle to keep Salmonella contamination off their products may have a new procedure at their disposal: add some salt and turn up the heat.

It’s more complex than just that, but it’s the key point of recent Food Safety Consortium research by Sara Milillo, a postdoctoral research associate in food science at the University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. Milillo reached her findings with Steven C Ricke, Director of the university’s Center for Food Safety, where Milillo is conducting research under a two-year US Department of Agriculture fellowship grant.

“Our goal is to come up with a multiple hurdle treatment where we combine things to help prevent bacterial resistance by using different treatments that attack different functions or parts of the cells simultaneously,” Milillo explained.

Milillo’s study examined the application of heat at 55°C plus an acidified organic acid salt solution as a way of reducing Salmonella on chicken. The combined treatment resulted in significant reduction of the pathogen, leading Milillo to conclude that it may represent an effective method for decontaminating poultry carcasses during processing.

Milillo also tried heat and salt treatments separately and found that neither one was adequate standing alone to do the job. An application of 2.5% organic acid salt solution did not reduce Salmonella appreciably. “We did heat alone to see if that had an effect by itself and it didn’t, even beyond 55°C,” she said.

These experiments were conducted using chicken juice, a raw chicken model medium, rather than chicken carcasses. The results tell enough of a story to draw valid conclusions, but more information will be available by taking the research to another level that uses chicken carcasses.

“We can screen treatments much faster in a broth-model type of situation,” Milillo said. “We’re hoping the chicken juice gets us a step closer to an actual raw poultry system. But by using chicken juice initially we can screen lots of treatments and narrow down what’s the most effective, before we go into a more costly use of actual carcasses. I view this as using your resources efficiently.”

Milillo and industry personnel have reviewed processing procedures that could be adapted to the research findings. Heated washes are used in steps to clean carcasses, so the use of a salt additive in a heated rinse might be one place to implement new methods.

Experiments with carcasses will come later, possibly followed later by tests to determine how the combined heat and organic acid salt treatments would apply to poultry after it has been eviscerated in the processing plant.

“At any point where risk of a carcass being contaminated is higher there is a need for more effective antimicrobials,” Milillo said. “So save your most powerful antimicrobial interventions for those processing steps, with the ultimate goal of an even safer product.”

Related Articles

Fake spirits: developing methods to prevent counterfeits

Around a quarter of all spirits consumed are estimated to be fake so researchers are compiling...

Australian bushfood could extend shelf life of meat

Kakadu plum is showing promise as a chemical-free alternative for meat preservation due to its...

Specialised compressed air for the food industry

Compressed air is a key utility supporting the food packaging and food processing industries in...


  • All content Copyright © 2024 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd