Nutrition labels on food products: which ones work best?


Wednesday, 06 October, 2021


Nutrition labels on food products: which ones work best?

A new analysis has integrated findings from 134 studies of the impact of colour-coded nutrition labels and warnings found on the front of some food packaging, indicating that these labels do indeed appear to encourage more healthful purchases. Jing Song of Queen Mary University of London, UK, and colleagues present these findings, which could also help refine food labelling policies, in the open-access journal PLOS Medicine.

Many countries have introduced mandatory front-of-package labelling in the hope of improving people’s diets and reducing the burden of diseases associated with poor diets. These labels may employ colour-coding to indicate nutrition, or they may warn consumers about unhealthful features of products. However, studies on the impact of such labelling have produced mixed evidence.

To help clarify the impact of front-of-package nutrition labels, Song and colleagues analysed data from 134 peer-reviewed studies published between January 1990 and May 2021. They applied an analytical method known as network meta-analysis in order to integrate the results of the studies and evaluate the impact of four different labelling systems — two that use colour-coding and two that use warnings.

This meta-analysis showed that all four labelling systems appeared to be advantageous in encouraging consumers to purchase more nutritionally beneficial products. Evaluation of specific nutritional qualities found that labelling nudged consumers towards foods and drinks with lower levels of energy, sodium, fat and saturated fat.

The analysis also highlighted psychological mechanisms that may underlie the different strengths of different labels, due to their impact on consumers’ understanding of nutrition information and resulting changes in attitudes towards unhealthful or healthful foods. Colour-coded labels appeared to be more beneficial in promoting more healthful purchases, and warning labels were more effective in discouraging unhealthy purchases.

These findings could help guide and refine policies on front-of-package labelling to improve public health. Meanwhile, future research could build on this study by addressing related concepts, such as the impact of labelling on reformulation of products by the food industry or more long-term benefits of labelling on purchasing behaviour.

Image credit: ©stock.adobe.com/au/studioworkstock

Related Articles

Winners announced: 2022 Australasian Packaging Innovation & Design (PIDA) Awards

The winners of the 2022 Australasian Packaging Innovation & Design (PIDA) Awards were...

Edible QR coded tags to verify alcohol authenticity

Researchers are developing tiny, edible silk tags with QR codes, which can be suspended in...

2022 APPMA Awards of Excellence winners announced

Winners of the national awards program for Australia's packaging and processing industry were...


  • All content Copyright © 2022 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd