Greater social distancing could curb COVID-19 in 13 weeks

Wednesday, 25 March, 2020

Greater social distancing could curb COVID-19 in 13 weeks

A University of Sydney data study from the Faculty of Engineering has revealed that social distancing must be adopted by at least 80% of the Australian population to reduce the spread of COVID-19.

The research found that if 90% of the Australian population adopted social distancing, the spread of COVID-19 could be controlled by July 2020, whereas social distancing of less than 70% would not suppress the pandemic.

If social distancing measures were adopted by at least 80% of the Australian population, we could expect to see a control of the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in just over three months, new research by the University of Sydney has found.

Led by Complex Systems academic and pandemic modelling expert Professor Mikhail Prokopenko, the study also revealed that social distancing would be an unproductive measure if adopted by less than 70% of the population.

“If we want to control the spread of COVID-19 — rather than letting the disease control us — at least 80% of the Australian population must comply with strict social distancing measures for at least four months,” Professor Prokopenko said.

“However, if 90% of the population complies, then the duration could be as short as 13 to 14 weeks — meaning if we began tomorrow we could expect a control of COVID-19 by July,” he said.

“Conversely, if less than 70% of the population is adopting social distancing measures, we cannot suppress the spread of the pandemic and any social distancing could be a fruitless effort,” he said.

“There is a clear trade-off — stricter measures imposed earlier would reduce how long our lives are impacted by this disease. On the contrary, laxer protocols could mean a longer, more drawn out and ineffective struggle against COVID-19,” he said.

The research also found that for every day the stricter social distancing measures are delayed, society would need to endure several more days under a longer suppression policy.

“There’s good reason for imposing tough measures early on. The longer we delay the peak, the more time our healthcare system has to prepare for it by accessing more resources such as ICU beds, ventilators, antivirals and trained health workers,” Professor Prokopenko said.

The researchers also found that while school closures had the potential to compensate for 10% of a lack of social distancing compliance, they only delayed the peak of the pandemic by two weeks.

They also found that school closures did not significantly reduce new cases for older adults, but slightly increased the fraction of new cases in children around the peak of the pandemic in Australia.

Figure 1. Strong compliance with social distancing (at 80% and above) effectively controls the disease during the suppression period, while lower levels of compliance (at 70% or less) do not succeed for any duration of the suppression. Credit: Professor Mikhail Prokopenko, University of Sydney

The modelling

The AceMod simulator comprises over 24 million software agents, each with attributes of an anonymous individual, such as age, gender, occupation, susceptibility and immunity to diseases. Contact rates within different social contexts, such as households, household clusters, local neighbourhoods, schools, classrooms and workplaces are also built into the program.

The set of generated agents captures average characteristics of the real population and is calibrated to 2016 Australian Census data with respect to key demographic statistics.

The interactions result in transmission of the disease from infectious to susceptible individuals: given the contact and transmission rates, the simulation computes and updates agents’ states over time, starting from initial infections, seeded in international airports around Australia.

In this scenario, 80% social distancing could either mean any person in one household could go out once in five days, or, one member per family of five could go out daily, but the other four stay at home all the time.


The study, Modelling transmission and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, was authored by PhD students Sheryl Chang and Nathan Harding, as well as Dr Cameron Zachreson, Dr Oliver Cliff and Professor Mikhail Prokopenko from the University of Sydney’s Centre for Complex Systems, and Marie Bashir Institute for Infection Diseases and Biosecurity.

This article has been republished with permission from the University of Sydney.

Image credit: ©

Originally published here.

Related Articles

AIP professional designation for packaging technologists

AIP offers professional designations that are internationally recognised and can help to raise...

Extra funding and flights to help food exporters

The COVID-19 crisis is placing pressure on Australian food exporters; now extra government...

Who's made the final cut in the 2020 PIDA Awards?

The Australasian Packaging Innovation & Design Awards has unveiled its list of finalists,...

  • All content Copyright © 2020 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd