Allergen labelling errors: call for stricter packaging rules
Dr Giovanni Zurzolo, a research fellow in the Allergy and Lung Health Unit at the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health and a Murdoch Children’s Research Institute honorary fellow, investigates food labelling and cross-contact issues.
In an article published in the Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, Dr Zurzolo raised questions about the cause of food recalls and how potential allergens should be approached.
Using Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) data from 2018, he said incorrect labelling caused most food recalls from 2016–2018. Until then, it had been assumed that cross-contact, where something went wrong in the supply chain, such as nut traces finding their way into chocolate, was the main cause.
“Our current results suggest that in Australia, packaging errors are a leading cause of food recalls due to presence of undeclared food allergens, not allergen cross-contact,” Dr Zurzolo said.
“This finding may also explain the relatively high prevalence of consumer reported anaphylaxis to processed food, as we have previously reported.”
Dr Zurzolo said from 2009–2018, FSANZ conducted 675 food recalls. Undeclared allergens (39%); microbial contamination, such as yeast or bacteria (26%); and foreign matter (16%) accounted for most recalls.
In mid-2016, FSANZ added another question to determine the cause of undeclared allergen recalls. It wanted to find out why the prevalence of recalls due to undeclared allergens was so high. It found that for 2016–2018, packaging errors where the food product was either packed into incorrect packaging or was incorrectly labelled accounted for 56% of these recalls, supplier verification issues 16% and cross-contact 10%.
Dr Zurzolo, whose work is funded by the Centre for Food and Allergy Research, said this demonstrates a strong need for better packaging procedures. “There is a need for improved packaging practices to minimise foods with undeclared allergens and increase food safety for food allergic consumers,” Dr Zurzolo said.
Ingredient labels are regulated in Australia, but precautionary labelling is optional. Dr Zurzolo said the data covered reported incidents, so the actual incidence could be higher. He said this meant some consumers faced unnecessary risks. Allergen statements could also be confusing.
“We have called upon industry and governments to have one risk-assessment process that all manufacturers must adhere to,” Dr Zurzolo said. “That would help reduce the chances of these adverse reactions.”
Dr Zurzolo said the prevalence of incorrect labelling could be contributing to allergy problems. “Hopefully, this identification will help industry to reduce the problem,” he said. “Authorities should mandate one risk assessment process as currently we are unsure of what process is being used by the majority of manufacturers. And government auditing of manufacturers should be more prevalent.”
The call follows a bipartisan federal parliamentary inquiry accepting all recommendations by the Centre for Food and Allergy Research, hosted at Murdoch Children’s Research Institute in June 2020, to help prevent, cure and manage food allergies.
Future key trends in sustainable lidding solutions for packaging in Australia and New Zealand, as...
Replacing the plastic tray in food packaging with a combination of paperboard and plastic could...
Zip-Pak has been offering reclosure/reseal solutions for flexible packaging for many years and it...